Do you know where these comments come from? Let us know!
| FCC ID | Name | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1051011443508 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510088505647 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 105102288921380 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 1051086835265 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510498800921 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 1051096084415 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510055817893 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510024917241 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510025959863 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 1051050744685 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510143727468 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 105102423713230 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510880011222 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510222209846 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510697023894 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510024234088 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 1051012396907 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 1051031399526 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 105102312918487 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 1051017298974 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 1051072738882 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 105102424401857 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 105101601512032 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 1051001163188 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510491401646 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 1051085278467 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510692808733 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510580030311 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 105100092304007 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510157547398 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510676727885 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510356418244 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 1051018281413 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 105101906103718 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 105102602105148 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510050397192 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510936130681 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 105101125423369 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 1051061790081 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 105101623604098 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510005014072 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510561524891 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510881515228 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510126621422 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 1051058014369 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510378226785 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 105102367014587 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 1051093064070 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510699216892 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |
| 10510373412135 | Christopher Keefe | This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108 |