Fork me on GitHub

bot.illogically_named: 93

Do you know where these comments come from? Let us know!

Comment Form
  • On-site 0
  • Off-site 93
Throwaway Email
  • True 0
  • False 6
Address
  • Full Address 93
  • Partial Address 0
Email Confirmation
  • True 6
  • False 0
  • Missing 87
Filing Method
  • API 93
  • Spreadsheet 0
  • Direct 0
Filing Dates
  • 04/17 - April 93

Sample of 50 Comments

FCC ID Name Comment
1051011443508 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510088505647 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
105102288921380 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
1051086835265 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510498800921 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
1051096084415 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510055817893 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510024917241 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510025959863 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
1051050744685 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510143727468 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
105102423713230 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510880011222 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510222209846 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510697023894 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510024234088 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
1051012396907 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
1051031399526 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
105102312918487 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
1051017298974 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
1051072738882 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
105102424401857 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
105101601512032 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
1051001163188 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510491401646 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
1051085278467 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510692808733 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510580030311 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
105100092304007 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510157547398 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510676727885 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510356418244 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
1051018281413 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
105101906103718 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
105102602105148 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510050397192 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510936130681 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
105101125423369 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
1051061790081 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
105101623604098 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510005014072 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510561524891 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510881515228 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510126621422 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
1051058014369 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510378226785 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
105102367014587 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
1051093064070 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510699216892 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108
10510373412135 Christopher Keefe
This illogically named "restoring internet freedom" filing is aimed squarely at the freedom of the internet, not at the Internet Service Providers who are gunning for more money and less citizen involvement in keeping the internet free. Regulating the internet like a utility (which is the most appropriate category for the service provided) protects consumer rights from corporate entites (ISPs) whose only purpose is to generate shareholder value, not protect their customers rights or data. Please, do NOT deregulate the protection of the internet, and do NOT adopt these corporate-favoring rules to dismantle the freedom that the internet was built on. It's bad for business, and bad for America. NO on filing 17-108